Submission Guidelines
The papers which do not meet the submission guidelines may be returned to the author(s) for revision.
▪
Full Paper (Presentation and Publication)
The full paper should be no less than 10 pages. And the maximum paper length is 12 printed pages, including all figures, tables, and references, and extra page will be charged.
▪
Abstract (Presentation only)
We encourage you to send informative abstract (200-400 words) which is a
compendious summary of a paper's substance including its background, purpose,
methodology, results, and conclusion.
▪ Please download the
full paper template or
abstract template and follow the format
carefully.
▪ Your submission should be in English.
▪ Please fill in author background form in the template.
▪ WARNING: You are not allowed to modify the list of authors after the
submission. It is mandatory to include the full list (in the correct order) when
submitting the paper online.
Submission Method
Once you prepared your paper according to the above guidelines,
▪ Please log in the
Online
Submission System and upload your paper or directly submit your paper to
icmei_contact@yeah.net.
▪ Your submission will be confirmed immediately by the system and in 2 working
days by conference secretary.
▪ For any inquiry about the submission and conference, please feel free to
contact us at
icmei_contact@yeah.net.
Double and Concurrent Submissions
▪ Submissions to ICMEI 2027 must not substantially overlap with papers that are
published or simultaneously submitted to other venues (including journals or
conferences/workshops).
▪ Double-submission will result in immediate rejection.
▪ Detected violations may be reported to other conference chairs and journal
editors.
Peer Review Process
ICMEI 2027 relies on the Double-blind peer review process to uphold the quality
and validity of individual articles and the proceedings that publish them.
1. Manuscripts submitted to the conference first go through an initial screening by
the program committee.
2. Those that clear the screening are sent to at least two experts for peer
review.
3. Peer reviewers independently make a recommendation to the program chairs as
to whether the manuscript should be rejected or accepted (with or without
revisions).
4. Program chairs consider all the feedback from peer reviewers and make an
informed decision to accept or reject the manuscript.